For a moment, let us suspend our disbelief. Let’s say I went out and bought a gun. I am not talking about a modified AR-15. I am talking about a simple handgun. I will even go so far as to make it a .357. Okay, so we have the scene set. Now, because I have a second amendment right to own such a firearm and I am celebrating my right to do so, what do I do next?
How about one of the two things?
One, I could use my handgun to go out and shoot someone. No one in particular. Just someone. Someone that is bothering me. I will say I was standing my ground.
Two, I could use my gun in self-defense of my family. While I understand the statistics show that there are as many accidental shootings as there are cases of self-defense, I am going to have it available to shoot someone that I don’t want in my house (uninvited).
Now both of these scenarios could end with me shooting someone.
Are the shootings the same? Is the use of the gun the same?
So, you may ask yourself, what is my point?
I recently read a piece about the #walkaway movement. This movement is suggesting that people walk away from the Democratic Party because they are espousing the very things they are complaining about. Bigotry. Intolerance. Using people to further a cause. Here is the thing.
I get this every day. People constantly tell me that I am the problem. That my constant attacks on Trump supporters and the new conservative agenda are shutting down conversation. I am exactly the self-righteous person I rail against.
It is bullshit.
I am fighting against bigotry, racism, misogyny, homophobia, sexism, toxic masculinity, and profit over people.
They are fighting against being called that.
Democrats are bigoted against the bigots, show intolerance toward the intolerant. Democrats fight for other people by questioning policy.
Is it being intolerant to call out the intolerant? Is it being a bigot to show policies of bigotry?
This is the difference in what I meant by the gun metaphor. Both times I have a gun. But, what is it being used for?
The #walkaway people have made up a cause because they have no defense. And the people that are doing it? Conservatives. This is really popular among conservatives.
There is another issue I have with this contrived hashtag movement called #walkaway.
It is a command. It is telling you to walk away. Shouldn’t it be #walkedaway because you did? By making this an imperative sentence, it is suggesting you haven’t done it. Look at the other hashtag movements.
#metoo This suggests it happened to the person.
#notmypresident Suggests a political belief.
#blacklivesmatter Says that a group is important.
But, #walkaway? This is feeble and laughable.
So, why did I start out talking about guns? I knew that the people that this was intended for would at least start reading it.
Recently, I saw a picture online of John Edwards and Donald Trump. No, they weren’t together. They were in side-by-side with a caption by each. The one describing Edwards noted that he paid off a woman he was having an affair with and his career was ruined. The one describing Trump noted that he paid off a woman he was having an affair with and his career is being applauded. This troubles me.
We are barreling into a time where there is a schism so wide that simple ideas of right and wrong are being redefined. What was a ghastly act by a former candidate is now acceptable. What was considered to be morally reprehensible is now just a character flaw. This wavering of morality (and ethics) to suit an agenda is forcing(?) people to redefine what they believe, or, at times, compartmentalize it. So, certain behavior is okay if things are going your way?
I was having a conversation the other day (well, argument) with a conservative, Trump supporter and I questioned her/his support for Trump. During this ‘discussion’ it was noted that this person didn’t really care about Trump’s personality, his indiscretions, his commentary, or his attitude. The only comment was, “He gets things done.” Be that as it may, this person prides her/himself as being Christian. Trump’s behavior, commentary, and braggadocio are decidedly not. Over the course of time, I have noticed that collectively this view is common. Where individuals are appalled at the fact that Bill Clinton had an affair in the Oval Office and Hilary forgave him (maybe?), they see no problem with the idea of Trump having an affair with a porn star or a Playboy model.
Okay…I know there is a difference. Clinton was president at the time. But, if this is the argument, it would be that because he was president he was held to a different standard. Well, based on this assumption, shouldn’t Trump be held to the same standard? Shouldn’t evidence (which is just coming out) that he had an affair put into question his character?
And using this logic, wouldn’t it be not just about affairs, but about the office of the president? On the campaign trail and while in office, he has made derogatory comments about minorities, celebrities, opponents, and the press. These aren’t just statements of disagreement, they are juvenile diatribes using language more suited middle school. For instance:
This moral relativism is just self-serving. People can argue all they want about speaking the truth, honesty, or telling it like it is, but it is contrary to the type of commentary that would be accepted from another politician, candidate, office-seeker, or president. Yet, it is justified because of the convenience. They have their candidate and everything will be overlooked because they are getting what they want. I am trying to still figure out what that is.
However, this goes beyond just the presidency. This moral relativism has become a worldview. People say they care deeply about life, but don’t care about children. People say they care about everyone, but also support political incorrectness. People say they care about children, but want to cut their healthcare. This contradictory belief system is merely moral relativism. Standards change depending on how they feel. If they are the minority party, any hint of commentary or behavior that is questionable is horrible. When they are the party in power, it is okay.
Perhaps this is why we are fractured as a society. A great number of people are self-serving, inconsistent in their beliefs, and don’t have a solid foundation for argument.
As a purveyor of many an argument on social media, I am growing increasingly frustrated with the process. As someone that has been trained in classical rhetoric, modern rhetoric, political science, academic writing, and was an English teacher for 11 years, I stand aghast at the feeble attempts at arguing by many people on both sides. While much of my ire is based on the arguments of the right, I have my reservations about arguments on the left as well (but for entirely different reasons).
I cannot tell you how many times I have been engaged in an argument (typically with someone from the right) in which I find myself growing angry. My anger isn’t centered in the discrepancy of our opinions (okay, it is), but on the argument itself. Too many times these discussions/arguments turn into vitriolic pissing contests. How does this happen? People don’t know how to form a cogent argument that is not only logically sound, but based on evidence. It is easier to call upon talking points, name calling, and an ignorance of thoughtful discussion.
I think my biggest issue when arguing is the use of the red herring. I cannot explain how many times I have questioned the motivations and behaviors of the president only to have the retort be something like, “Well, we had to live with Obama for eight years.” This is not an argument. This is changing the subject. When pursued, the conversation becomes about the atrocities of the Obama administration (Obamacare) and the made up destruction of the country. Or the often used, “What about Hillary’s emails?”
Okay, yes, there was an issue with the emails. She used a private server and a private email account. After years of investigation, nothing was found to be dangerous. Does this make it okay? No. But, it does put it into perspective. This leads me to another fallacy of argument—the double standard. The president uses personal phones (yes, I know, they are changed, but rarely) for his rampant tweeting. But, he says it is inconvenient to have the security on them. If you remember, this is what Hillary said.
Perhaps the two related logical fallacies that get the most use are the ad hominem and ad populum arguments. In fact, I probably should have started with this. The ad hominem argument is the fall back for both sides. I remember being in a discussion with someone and the first responses were, “communist, socialist, and libtard.” Friends, this is weak argument. In fact, it devolves back to a time when we would say things like, “I am rubber and you are glue. What you say bounces off of me and sticks to you.” Paired with this is the immediate reduction to ad populum name calling using terms that aren’t meant provoke a response for your peers. Terms like Nazi, fascist, socialist, communist, and the like are nothing more than signs that you have nothing to say. At the same time, the argument that protesting the government or kneeling or burning the flag or anything of the like makes you less than American or a communist or a socialist is, in fact, the contradictory. It is a cornerstone of our democracy.
Another gripe that falls high on my list is that of the use of faulty generalizations. This irritates me to no end. This argument never fails to come up. It seems that if someone can find an example that supports her/his argument, then it must be truth. It is a form of confirmation bias. It is ridiculous. An example of something is just an example. Because someone did it, it doesn’t mean everyone did it. Or can do it. While this isn’t about the president, I find that the argument about climate change comes up the most. The vast majority of climate scientists agree that climate change is man-made. However, there are a few that don’t. Climate deniers focus on the few using examples like, “Well, at one time people thought the world was flat.” That is not an argument. It is the opposite.
Finally (for this post), is the use of association. All liberals and leftists are not the same. As all conservatives and Trump supports aren’t. But, we lump them together. I was recently called a socialist and a communist, not because of what I said, but because of the assumption that I was because of my views. Okay, maybe I do adhere to many socialist beliefs and think that free-market capitalism is incredibly dangerous. However, I am not a socialist. Or a communist. My worldview is shaped by what I read, what I hear, what I see, and me trying to put it all together.
Last, but now least, we need to discuss and argue with skill. Here are things we can not say.
That is not true.
You are...(some derogatory thing).
Blah, blah, blah…because s/he did it.
I have had to live with…
It is your turn.
Anything you say without evidence.
What about Hillary?
On Friday, May 11, I had the honor of attending the 2018 Campaign Kick-Off Dinner hosted by the Columbia County Democratic Party. We are able to meet other candidates, see old friends, and bring together many different people to promote the upcoming election.
The reason for this post, however, is to bring forward a troubling occurrence that happened during the program. In fact, it is more than troubling. What happened reflects the seething undercurrent of bigotry and oppression that plagues this country.
One of the invited speakers read a version of the poem, “I am Somebody,” as part of his speech. The poem itself, while a bit overused, comes across as a unifying lyric to bring people together. A version of the poem appears below.
I may be poor. But I am Somebody!
I may be young. But I am Somebody!
I may make a mistake. But I am Somebody!
I must be respected, protected, never rejected.
I am God's child.
I am Somebody!
The speaker ad-libbed portions of the poem to be seemingly inclusive. He added the following line, “"I may be gay... oh no... but uh, I am somebody.” The addition of this line, and the stuttering pause, negated the sentiment, tone, and meaning of the message. More to the point, it reaffirmed the inherent bigotry many have for the LGBTQIA* community.
Coming from the chair of the 12th Congressional District, this not only was callous and ignorant, but also came from a place of authority. It should be immediately condemned.
On that note, too often we find in our leaders these microaggressions, small comments meant as humor, scalding statements in the underbreath, or the invisible stare through someone. All of these things only reinforce bigotry.
Because of this, there is an inherent danger in the spoken word. Any person, when given a platform, can easily cast dispersions upon another person or group through seemingly innocuous statements. But, these statements are far from that.
As a society, we claim to celebrate diversity. We claim to celebrate our humanity. We claim to celebrate freedom. However, in reality this diversity, humanity and freedom is of the convenience those in power. We need leaders that are thoughtful, reflective, and understand that a diverse and inclusive society is key to our growth as humanity.
For the past few years (and previously just in thought), I have devoted myself to diversity, inclusion, and social justice. When I see episodes like this, I have a two minds. One mind is painful frustration and ire toward those that behave this way. The other is one of hope, because when this happens, we have conversations, open up dialogues, and expose these realities and, perhaps take tiny steps toward a more inclusive society.
I would like to close with a poem by Kiowa writer, N. Scott Momaday.
I am a feather on the bright sky
I am the blue horse that runs in the plain
I am the fish that rolls, shining, in the water
I am the shadow that follows a child
I am the evening light, the lustre of meadows
I am an eagle playing with the wind
I am a cluster of bright beads
I am the farthest star
I am the cold of dawn
I am the roaring of the rain
I am the glitter on the crust of the snow
I am the long track of the moon in a lake
I am a flame of four colors
I am a deer standing away in the dusk
I am a field of sumac and the pomme blanche
I am an angle of geese in the winter sky
I am the hunger of a young wolf
I am the whole dream of these things
You see, I am alive, I am alive
I stand in good relation to the earth
I stand in good relation to the gods
I stand in good relation to all that is beautiful
I stand in good relation to the daughter of Tsen-tainte
You see, I am alive, I am alive
Peace be to all of you.
The Time is Now
I don’t quite understand why some people don’t vote. Every election we have directly influences our lives. At the city, county, state, and national level, every election makes a difference. Yet, nationally, there is apathy. In the last election, we had approximately 55% of the voting age population vote. In 2012, it was 55%. In 2008 we had the highest turnout since 1968, and it was 58%.
That is appalling.
Some people put in the effort. They get to know the candidates. They ask questions. They do the research.
A great many people vote on single issues. They care about one thing (or a few things) and base their decisions only on that. Others vote by party. Some vote because they have seen the name. Our democracy takes effort. You have to want it.
In Columbia County in the last midterm election 2,758 people voted for the school board. There are 27,000 voters in District 3. That is 10%.
That is appalling.
I know that you might not have school age children. But, having a strong school district is important for society. It helps with the economy. It helps the social structure. It helps the future.
In talking to people, it seems that people care what is going on. Well, the time is now to show that you care. On May 22, go out and vote. Or, vote early.
When you do, please consider voting for Andrew Kemp for Columbia County School Board, District 3. I am an experienced educator (11 year public school teacher). I have a doctorate in curriculum and instruction and teach in a College of Education where I teach teachers. I have done administrative work as a program coordinator in a public school. My children have gone through Columbia County Schools since 2010.
When thinking about who I the most qualified, think about the big picture.
You have choices. But, if you are looking for someone that has experience, a deep knowledge of education and the system, a candidate that is a critical thinker about educational issues, and someone that is current and relevant, vote Andrew Kemp.
On May 22, vote Andrew Kemp for Columbia County School Board, District 3.
To learn more, visit http://andrewtkemp.com/
Or email me at firstname.lastname@example.org
I would like to start by saying that the race for the Columbia County School Board is a non-partisan race. It is about finding the person that is best for the position. It is about finding the person that understands education, is forward thinking, and has the experience and education to move Columbia County Schools into the 21st century. However, there is also the reality of the world we live in.
We all have different opinions. No two people think the same way. That is what makes our society exciting. And terrifying. We can talk and debate and argue and scream at each other. Or we can combine our ideas to get to a place that is greater. I am sure that I have opinions that differ from many people. In fact, I know I do. Some of those ideas have to do with education. Many don’t. But, our combined voices are what can lead us forward.
One thing I have learned is that the school board is supposed to represent the community. In the last election in Columbia County, almost 70% of the people voted for Donald Trump. That means that 30% didn’t. I am in that 30%. What do know is that right now, the school board leans, no, falls to the right. Does that represent all of the people in the county? Does that represent all of the points of view that we have? My point is that we need a diversity of voices in order to work through the complexities of our educational system.
With this in mind, it is also important to reiterate that education is complicated. Discussion is necessary. Conversations need to be had. Differing opinions need to be represented. We are here to educate all of the children in the county and to represent all of the people in the county. Debates need to occur that consider various perspectives and aspects of life. But, the best part? It is a school board. It is made up for five people. No one person controls everything. Another opinion, another point of view that might look at things in a different way, can only benefit the decision making process.
Both of the other candidates for the school board fit the mold of the current school board based on my knowledge of them. Of course they are each individuals with their own ideas, but they fit in with the majority in Columbia County. The thing is, in many ways, so do I. I care about the education of our children. I care about the community. I care about the people that live here. To be honest, I am sure there are things that I believe that would rub people the wrong way. But, we live in a complex democracy that values discussions, debate, and conversation. With my experience (11 years in public schools) and education (Master’s and doctorate in education), coupled with my knowledge of Columbia County Schools (I have taught many of the teachers in the district), I will be the person that allows us to consider complexities of education, not just because I am a good listener, but because I have a deep knowledge of both the practical side schools (teaching and administration), but also the theoretical side of education and the possibilities that are ahead of us. Most importantly, I will allow all of the residents of Columbia County to be represented.
I am here for students and their learning. I want every student to succeed whether they are college bound, career prepared, or still not knowing what s/he wants out of life. A friend sent me a post the other day that said, “If we raise a test score, but fail to raise a reader, we have failed the child.” I think this is true on the broader sense. If we raise a test score, but fail to prepare a students for a successful, happy, and productive life in which they are active members of their community, we have failed the child.
If you would like to know more, please contact me at email@example.com or call at (706) 564-4541. You can also visit me at http://andrewtkemp.com/ or http://www.facebook.com/kemp4ccboe/ Please like my page.
If you would like to donate so that I can visit your neighborhood, please help. https://secure.actblue.com/donate/kemp4ccboe/
Vote for Andrew Kemp for Columbia County School Board, District 3 on May 22. Early voting starts on April 30.
While I was in college, I took a graduate class about political behavior. In this class we read a lot of theory about voting patterns, how people behave in elections, and we bridged the gap between this theory and what actually happens. Understand, this was in 2004 or so and many of the specifics are a little fuzzy.
What I remember most were two things. First, I did a major project on school boards and school board elections. At the time, I didn’t have any interest in being on a school board. But, I was interested in how they were constructed. According to my research, only about 17% of school board members have a background in education. Things like being a PTO president, substitute teacher, and school volunteer were considered a background (and this is valuable experience). However, after spending the last 10+ years in higher education studying our educational system, I have walked away with two things. First, educators need to make decisions about education. I completely understand the need for the public to have a voice, but more than 80% of the voice? Second, and perhaps more importantly, education is complicated. While most of us attended school in some fashion (I say most because of homeschooling), being a student doesn’t mean that you know education. That is akin to saying that being a patient means you know medicine. Or getting arrested means you know law.
I will be the first to admit that I don’t have expertise in medicine or law or engineering or the military or construction. Or a host of other careers. But, I do have expertise in education. I was a public school teacher for 11 years and have almost finished 11 years as a college professor in the field of education. In addition, I have two advanced degrees in education which took a total of seven years of graduate school. My experience and education qualifies me to not only be on a school board, but to understand the complexities, the depth of the issues, the ramifications of decisions, and the effects on not only students, but the community.
The second thing I learned in my study of political behavior is about elections. What I learned is that, according to research, all of what I said above doesn’t matter. If you ask an individual, yes, they care. But, in general, voters don’t focus on details. In the last election for this position, only about 10% of the registered voters voted. To me, that is sad for a democracy. Second, people vote for what they recognize.
Why do you think our roadways, empty lots, and neighborhoods are littered with political signs? We choose things we recognize. If you see a name over and over and over and over, when it comes time to decide who to vote for, you choose the name. In fact, the more you see it, the more likely you will vote. And what are you voting for? The name on a sign?
With this in mind, we also like simplicity. We don’t like complexity. We come up with catchy slogans. We come up with phrases to describe ourselves. I will admit, I am guilty of this. My slogan is, “An Educator for Education.” What does this even mean? It tells you that I am an educator. I think this is important. It also tells you that I am for education. And it sounds good.
In this election, I have two opponents. Both of them have slogans about being a voice. One says, “A New Voice, A Fresh Perspective.” The other says she wants to be, “The Voice for Education.” See? Simple and to the point. And sort of the same.
I argued earlier that we need educators in education. Why do we need a new voice? Especially a new voice that doesn’t have the background in the complexities of education. Listening to people isn’t enough. Considering that this is an open seat and none of us have ever been on a school board, don’t we all have a fresh perspective? The other slogan is more subtle. Where the first candidate says “A” new voice, suggesting it would be part of the conversation, the other slogan says, “The” voice. It is firm and solitary. Of course, this is the former English teacher in me probably over-analyzing the statement.
Coupled with this, people running for office are also told that they should have bullet points. Simple ideas that form the backbone of the ever present stump speech. When I did my first ones, I had 18. Like I said, education is complex. However, I shrunk it to five things. Recently, I added a sixth.
Again, we are all sort of guilty of doing this. One of my opponents has four points. It is a total of ten words. Of course, it does go further into depth. Well, 69 more words. My last blog post about education (which I do often so that you can know what I believe and my vision) was 573 words (https://www.andrewtkemp.com/…/21st-century-students-in-20th…). And that was yesterday. My other opponent states on her website, “I was advised that I would need to list at least three talking points on education – the issues and board topics that I would address during my campaign. While I can understand that this could make the campaign easier, please don’t expect me to take that approach.” So, we don’t even get that.
Why is this important? Like I said before, we like simplicity. We like comfort. We like things we recognize. But, is this the reason to vote for someone? Having lots of signs and having lots of meetings means one thing. You have money to do it. This stuff is expensive. And it gets your name out there. Heck, maybe I am lucky that you are seeing Kemp signs everywhere even though it is not me.
Please don’t get me wrong. I have a great amount of respect for the other candidates for this office. First, pledging oneself to public service is important and they both should be celebrated for wanting to do so. In addition, giving service to the country is a great sacrifice to make and should be respected. Being a 23 year educator shows a lot of experience in the schools and a solid background in education.
Campaigning is difficult. It takes time. It is draining. You have to put yourself out into the world knowing that you are going to be judged for what you do. And for what you don’t do. Your words will be analyzed. Your past will be investigated. Everything you say and post will factor into the equation.
But, it isn’t simple. Nor should it be treated as such. Living in a democracy is complicated. It takes effort. You have to pay attention. You have to work at it. With only 10% of the eligible voters coming out to vote for this office in the last election, it seems that we have a lot of work together to make our democratic democracy.
My name is Andrew Kemp. I am a candidate for the Columbia County School Board, District. 3.
Early voting starts on April 30.
Don't forget to vote for Andrew Kemp for Columbia County School School Board, District 3.
Times change. We have advancements in technology, knowledge, teaching techniques, and careers. According to the World Economic Forum, “65% of children entering primary school today will ultimately end up working in completely new job types that don’t yet exist,” (para. 1). Yet, somehow we have schools that are using 20th century information, technology, teaching techniques, and content. In fact, much of what we do is older that.
The traditional layout of the classroom, with the teacher at a desk in the front and the students at desks (usually in rows) was first widely used in the 16th century Jesuit schools in Europe. Note taking and memorization of knowledge is just as old. I collect antique English books. I have a literature book from 1879. With the exception of newer writing, the book is the same as we use today. Most of what we do in schools is based on tradition. We are slow to change.
If you think about it, most of us went through school. This is how we learned. And we here are, decades later, with various levels of success. Why change it if it isn’t broken.
It is broken.
We are using old, stale techniques and content for 21st century learners. We are using techniques, methods, and information that is becoming outdated. The 21st century needs students to be critical thinkers. The 21st century will need citizens that are creative problem solvers. We need students that think quickly, analyze situations, consider options, and use information to make informed decisions.
Right now, students sit in desks and take in information. And they are quizzed and tested. They are expected to know things. But, just know things. We need students to be able to do things. We need students to be able to experience things. We need students that understand the world around them, not just the world of their textbooks and lectures. We need students to be active in making this country better in every way.
And what we are doing in school now isn’t doing that. Students are so focused on getting good grades, getting the right answer, and earning every point, the content doesn’t have relevance.
It is time our schools rethink themselves for the 21st century. The idea that, “because that is the way it has always been done,” isn’t good enough.
When people move to the area, they shouldn’t just move to Columbia County because most of our schools have high test scores. High test scores don’t really mean anything. They are a measure on a certain day at a certain time. These tests have hijacked our education system. I was recently talking to a local educator about this very issue. I said that I thought that teachers should be given the freedom to try new and creative things in the classroom. I was told that this was a great idea, but many teachers would say, no, because they don’t have time because they have to cover the standards for the tests.
Is this what we have come to? Tests rule our schools?
As a school board member, I would work diligently to make Columbia County Schools not only known for test scores, but also for innovative practices, creative teaching, being at the forefront of education for the 21st century. People would come to Columbia County to get a great education that prepares students for life.
My name is Andrew Kemp. I am a candidate for the Columbia County, Georgia, School Board for District 3.
Vote for me on May 22, 2018. Vote Andrew Kemp.
In 2007, my family moved to Sycamore, Illinois. I had just taken a faculty position at Northern Illinois University and was starting my new career as a professor. As a lifelong soccer player, we decided to get my daughters involved with the local league. I coached both of my kids. One was in an under 8 league and the other was under 10. While I had experience coaching high school athletes, coaching kids was different.
My favorite story from that time was with my daughter’s U8 team. We were in the middle of a game and we had the ball at the opponent’s end of the field. The other team got the ball and started down the field. Our last player back, a six year old girl, was nowhere to be seen. The ball had been away for too long. She was running toward the woods next to the field chasing butterflies. Do you want to why? She liked butterflies. And, she was six. A six year old has a short attention span.
So, why this story? In the testing environment we have created, we expect children that are 8 or 9 years old to be able to pay attention to a 40-80 minute test on a computer. And that is just one day. Testing can take three days with multiple tests on the same day.
According to Edutopia, the average child can concentrate on a task for 2-5 minutes per year of age. To make the math easy, let’s look at a ten year old. That would be 20-50 minutes. Not even close to an 80 minute test.
Now, I am sure you are saying that you have seen your child play with toys for hours or watch TV for an eternity. That is true. But, that is something that is being chosen and enjoyed. Not a test.
Our current testing system has children as young as 7 or 8 sitting for multiple testing days with tests that last up to 80 minutes. In addition, these are done on computers. Not every child has a computer or the ability to use one. For children in the 3rd grade, this test is of utmost importance. If students fail the language arts portion of the test, they are retained. According to the National Association of School Psychologists (from the Center for Development and Learning), retention at a young age is associated with high school dropout (2-11 times more likely), a significantly decreased likelihood of any post-secondary education, and lower educational and employment status in later life.
In a study in the 1980s, it was found that retention was only behind losing a parent and going blind. In a repeat of the study in 2001, it moved ahead of both. Students that are retained have lower self-esteem, poorer attendance, and many other issues (http://www.cdl.org/articles/grade-retention-achievement-and-mental-health-outcomes/).
The point is that we have created a school system that doesn’t take into account the developmental level of the child. We don’t take into account the deleterious effects of testing. We don’t think about the reductionist view of education that only focuses on what is measureable. And it is damaging our education system.
Our schools are filled with wonderful teachers with wonderful ideas. There are fascinating things to learn in literature, science, history, math, music, art, and physical education. There are inspiring educators that are handcuffed by standards that could be creating learning environments that not only educate, but push our children to greatness.
We need to rethink what we are doing in schools. This assessment culture is diminishing us. It is diminishing our children. It is diminishing our world. When I think about children…when I think about my children when they were young, I don’t want to picture them sitting at a computer panicked, stressed, and unhappy. I want to picture them chasing butterflies.
Please vote for Andrew Kemp for the Columbia County, Georgia, School Board—District 3. Visit http://andrewtkemp.com/ for more information.
Friends, Colleagues, and Neighbors,
My name is Andrew Kemp. I am a candidate for the Columbia County, Georgia, School Board—District 3.
As a candidate in a local election, I have become acutely aware of the reality of our political system. It is complicated, frustrating, and much of it is filled with false bravado. There are meaningless statements and vague promises. Signs litter our roadways (of this I am guilty). Catchy slogans pop up about being an outsider, a new voice, or aligned with current policies. There is slick rhetoric about how a candidate can’t give specifics because there are too many issues, but they will all be addressed. Others focus on popular sentiments about current trends.
What does it all mean?
At all levels, our political system has become a quagmire of falsities and vagaries. We have become more interested in not saying the wrong thing instead of saying the right thing. Or, heck, saying anything. We don’t make statements that can be checked. We don’t readily address issues that are controversial. We don’t say things that beg people to ask us questions.
Well, that has to stop. It seems to me that people that get elected, many times, are the ones that we know the least. They play to comfort. They sit in the middle. They try to be everything to everyone. Well, that person does not exist.
So, hello. My name is Drew. I was a public school teacher/program coordinator for 11 years. I have two degrees in education (Master’s and doctorate). I have been in higher education for almost 11 years researching, teaching, and promoting education. Personally, I focus on the theories behind what we teach (which I believe is contextual). I teach student-centered instruction. I teach research methods. I am a social justice educator. I believe that all children have the right to learn. I believe that our focus on testing and assessment has diminished our education system. I believe that our schools need to reflect the community through what we teach. I believe that there is an overreliance on textbooks. I don’t believe that schools are failing, but don’t serve the best interests of our children. I believe that now more than ever we need school counselors to be counselors.
I do have a voice. It isn’t a new voice. It isn’t a vague voice. It isn’t a voice that is going to tell you that I can’t commit to an idea because there are too many. I am here. I am open. I am here to answer any questions that you have.
If you want to know more about me, follow my blog at http://andrewtkemp.com/blog/. I am going to start writing something almost every day.
If you have questions, ask. If you have concerns, share. If you want to talk, call. If you want to help, donate.
On May 22, 2018, vote for Andrew Kemp for the Columbia County School Board, District 3.
Generation Z and the Millennials: They Aren’t a Band
As an educator, my life has been devoted to educating our youth. Since I was five, I have either been a students or teacher (with the exception for a one year break when I was 23…I got married). As a student I evolved from a classic, distracted underachiever to a doctoral student with a 3.97. As a teacher I have taught everything from English as a Second Language in a native school in the Republic of the Marshall Islands to Career Research to Advanced Placement Language and Composition. As a faculty member at two different universities I have taught students from anywhere from their first year to teacher certification classes to graduate curriculum classes to doctoral classes on learning theory. Over the course of my career, I have learned one thing. Students are amazing.
There is much public consternation over the youngest generations—Generation Z and the Millennials. Both of these generations have been characterized as being needy, entitled, having short attention spans, and without focus. Well, that is the media argument. That is an excuse.
The Millennials, perhaps the most criticized generation by the media is been maligned for seeming indifference and entitlement. But, where does the fault lie? This generation grew up during a time of great prosperity. There was lots of money. Technology was exploding. America was on top. The Soviet Union fell. They grew up with many advantages. Yet, now we blame them for having high expectations. But, this generation now has their own children and see this world as needing change. Their children are in our schools. They are now settled into life. They have the ability to multi-task, are tech-savvy, are creative problem-solvers, are driven, and are socially conscious.
Generation Z, those born from 1995 on, are independent, have only lived with technology, are adaptable, and are global citizens. In addition, based on my experience, they are socially conscious and are incredibly open in celebrating all people. There are few preconceived notions about people and want to get to know people for who they are, not how they are labeled.
So, what is the point? Why focus on these groups?
On March 24, I attended the CSRA March for Our Lives march and rally. This was organized by four young women, high school students, as their way of saying, “This is enough!” This does not seem like a disenfranchised generation. This does not seem to be a group that is needy. This does not seem like a group with a short attention span. In fact, it is just the opposite. This protest, organized by Generation Z and attended by both, shows the power that these groups have. They are tired of the world they were given and are screaming out for change.
In Changes, David Bowie sang, “And these children that you spit on as they try to change their worlds, are immune to your consultations, they’re quite aware of what they are going through.” These young people, Generation Z and the Millennials, are quite aware of what they are going through. They see the cynicism, the conflict, the intolerance, the violence, the broken government, the fracturing American psyche. However, the country is ripe for change and these are the changers. No longer will they rely on older generations to do things for them. They are going to take control of their future and make a change for the better.
And they are voters. And they will vote.
So, Generation Z and Millennials, you have a chance to make a difference. Go out in droves and vote. Don’t let apathy and indifference be the status quo.
You will make a difference.
My name is Andrew Kemp. I am an candidate for the School Board of Columbia County, District 3.
On February 15, 2008, I sat down with my then 8-year-old daughter. She asked what was going on? She wanted to know what everyone was talking about. She had heard bad things. What I realized was that she was asking, “Are we safe?”
That is because on February 14, 2008, at 3:05pm, Steven Kazmierczak walked into Cole Hall at Northern Illinois University (where I was faculty) and opened fire into a lecture hall with a shotgun and three pistols (a Glock 19, and SIG Sauer P232, and an ACP Hi-Point CF380). He had eight full magazines.
Over the next few minutes, he shot 23 people of which six died.
At 3:03pm, I was sitting in my office in Gabel Hall, about 300 yards away. I was lucky. As the shooting started, I was leaving my office and walking out to my car the opposite direction. As I left the parking lot, all I saw were police, helicopters, fire rescue, and ambulances. It was a swarm. I thought, “What is going on?’ I quickly switched on the radio to local news and heard.
I called my wife and told her to turn on the news.
As a parent, you know that there are difficult conversations that you are going to have to have. There is, “The Talk.” You will have to talk about loved ones dying. There are breakups. There are lost friendships. But, nowhere in the parenting manual is there a chapter on, “Are we safe?” Nowhere in the rules for being a parent does it tell you that you need to worry about your child being shot at school.
Today, I spent my morning and early afternoon at a remarkable event. A group of students organized a March For Our Lives event in Columbia County, Georgia. The turnout was amazing. There was a march, a rally, chants… There were impassioned speeches from students. There were people of many races, religions, persuasions, and ages. It was truly moving.
People often criticize millennials. But, what I saw today gives me hope for the future.
Young people can make a difference.
We need to support these children in their endeavors. In this area, during the March 14 walkout, many schools were giving three day In-school Suspensions for walking out. I argue that we should march with the students. We should support them. We should make sure they are safe. The schools, the teachers, the administrations should all help our students become members of our democracy.
These are our children and our future.
Friends, Colleagues, and Neighbors,
Over the course of the last few months, I have written and spoken endlessly about the desperate need for critical and creative thinking in our schools. I haven’t given many details about how we can do that, so I am going to give you an example. Let me preface this by saying that this is not the only way to do this, but something I have done.
This semester, at Augusta University, I have been teaching a First Year Experience class for first year students. The theme for the year was Heroes and Humans. We were able to create any course we wanted to around this theme. My course was titled, “Students as Heroes: Becoming and Activist.” The idea of this course was for groups of students to find a cause of concern, research it, write about it, create a social media presence, and design a webpage. Some of the obvious areas of study were research, writing, marketing, rhetoric and persuasion, history (of the cause), technology, and communications.
For the class, the students came up with the following causes that they wanted the greater university to become more aware of:
Preservation of Public Space and Environmental Awareness
Animal Rights and Sea World
For this project, they were to create flyers, sign up students to get more information, and start campus conversations about their topics. As the final project, all students in the First Year Experience classes campus-wide have an Expo to share what they did in class. There are presentation boards, laptop computers, projectors, and presentations. My class, to promote communication, did little in terms of “presentation,” but went person to person to talk about what they had studied. They had people sign petitions so they could get more information. The person that studied HIV Awareness handed out condoms (remember, this is a college class and it was her idea—in fact it was a condom with a mint…condomints).
So, as the students studied areas of interest and things that ignited their passions, they were able to think critically about issues and what they truly meant. They had to make decisions about how to convince others, market their ideas, and persuade their peers about their causes. They creatively reached out to the public through their websites, some groups created buttons, others created social media campaigns.
The idea behind the First Year Experience class is to teach inquiry. To ask questions. To seek out answers. To research. To learn. In my class, we did all of those things. In addition, hopefully, the students became more aware of the world around them and started thinking deeply about their community and the greater good.
My name is Andrew Kemp. I am a candidate for the Columbia County, Georgia, School Board for District 3.
Attached are photos from the Expo where they shared their ideas.
Friends, Colleagues, and Neighbors,
Over the last few weeks, a number of people have asked me why I am running for the school board. This question has tumbled around in my head bouncing from the specific to the abstract, from the idealistic to the practical. Over the last few days for some reason, it has started to become more clear and tangible.
I love my children. I want them to have a happy and healthy future. I want them to be successful in life and to be active members of society. I want them prepared for the complexities of living in this society.
Our schools aren’t doing that. Even schools that are considered excellent, like in Columbia County, are severely lacking when it comes to any kind of preparation for life. I know. We have “college and career readiness” programs and curriculum. That isn’t a preparation for life. That is a preparation for the workforce. Life is more than a job.
Life is about being able to consider various viewpoints and make a decision.
Life is about being able to take a stand.
Life is about being comfortable with who you are and be able to celebrate that.
Life is about finding creative solutions to problems.
Life is about finding what you love and pursuing it.
Life is about thinking critically about the world around you.
Life is about caring about your peers, neighbors, community, and world.
Life is about processing information to create new and innovative ideas.
Life is about discovering who you are, what you believe, and what is important.
Our schools aren’t doing that. We are so concerned with test scores, money, being right, and striving to be the best, that we have lost sight of childhood. We demand academic greatness, but at what cost?
Why am I running? Because we can do it better. We can take what we do well and expand it. We can create schools that not only achieve high marks on the measures that are given, but also create meaningful learning environments.
I know this is an odd reference, but in the movie Footloose (the Kevin Bacon one), Reverend Shaw (played by John Lithgow) says, “If we don't start trusting our children... how will they ever become trustworthy?” Well, the same is true about our schools. If we don’t let our children think, analyze, discover, and create….how will they ever be able to think, analyze, discover, and create?
Why am I running? I want my daughters, no, I want all children to not be so consumed with the content of school that they miss out on living. I want all children to be active members of their communities, of society, and of the country. I want all children to be able to think for themselves and be able to made decisions.
My name is Andrew Kemp. The reason I am running for the Columbia County, Georgia School Board for District 3 is to take what we do well, and move it forward so that all students can have the knowledge, skills, and background to live a successful and happy life.
Friends, Colleagues, and Neighbors,
Well, it is official. Today around 10am I filled out the final paperwork for qualifying for the election. I gave the name as I wanted to see it on the ballot (I hope I didn’t misspell.). I sent out my financial disclosure forms. I formally created my campaign committee. I am an official candidate for Columbia County (Georgia) School Board, District 3. Never in my wildest dreams did I think I would run for public office. But, times are such that I had to do something.
The reason that I am running for this office is to try to help change what we are doing in schools. Now, don’t get me wrong. The schools in Columbia County are great. But, our education system is so focused on right and wrong, black and white, yes and no, that we are missing the context of creativity and critique.
We need to rethink what we are doing. Now, I am a realist. I know that in this educational climate, testing and money go hand in hand. However, there are ways to teach, curricula that can be designed, and materials that can be used in which test scores stay high, but students also can think creatively. They can act critically. They can problem solve. They can discover. They can explore. They can grow.
That is my plan. Yes, I know that dealing with school issues, zoning, budgeting and other things is part of the position. But, it can be more than that.
My name is Andrew Kemp. I have qualified for the election as a candidate for Columbia County School Board, District 3. Please help me move forward.
Partisanship and Schools
Friends, Colleagues, and Neighbors,
I find myself in a new place. Since I started running for the Columbia County (Georgia) School Board, District 3, I have found myself with a whirlwind of ideas. As someone that has spent an entire life in education (either student, teacher, or professor), I feel like I have gained the experience and education required to make informed decisions that are in the best interests of all students.
And then there is the political sphere. Whether we like it or not, running for a public office is a political act. This race, for the school board, is non-partisan. You cannot declare a party. Education is supposed to be free from political influence. Yet, I have read comments to articles about the political leanings of candidates. I have been asked directly with which party I identify. I have been put on the spot to label myself.
Does it matter? My one and only concern is to improve the education of our children. We are bound by the shackles of testing and assessment. In my opinion, it has taken away from our educational system. While almost every school espouses the virtues of critical and creative thinking, how does that happen when everything has been broken down into testable pieces.
During this campaign, I have reached out to both parties. However, recently, reaching out and being asked specifically for a label, I was told, “No.” I wasn’t that party. They didn’t want to hear what I had to say. For a non-partisan race, it certainly seems partisan.
I am here, I am running for the betterment of our schools. Where I live, we have an outstanding school district. The scores are high, students move on to college and career, and the reputation is great. But, there is more to schools that this. It is more than, “Move them along to college and career.” This is the time for students to learn to live, to think, to understand, to analyze. It is the time to critique, to participate in the world, to discover. It is the time to be creative, critical and conscientious. Right now our schools teach students three things: content, conformity, and compliance. And then we expect them to be contributing members of society.
If those things and wanting those things are partisan issues, I guess I am partisan. Are there issues where I am slanted one way? Of course. I don’t think we should arm teachers. I think schools should not focus just on skills and content, but on critical and creative thinking. I think that teachers aren’t just there to fill young minds with information, but to allow students to question. I think that we only celebrate success (tests, grades and awards). We need to let children fail. There is a famous quote that has been attributed to Thomas Edison. He said, I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work.” We don’t let our students fail and learn from failure.
If this is partisan, wanting more from our schools, then I am partisan. And you should be, too.
Friends, Colleagues, and Neighbors.
After the tragic events in Parkland, there has been a movement of students about the issue of school safety. Recently, someone asked my opinion on the idea of student protests, walkouts, and the threat of punishment.
I think that everyone wants our youth to be thoughtful and involved in the world around them. The First Amendment grants, “The right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” With this in mind, I believe that students have the right to protest and have a well-planned and organized walkout. Students availing themselves of their right to protest in support of safer schools is not only noble, but also has the potential of enacting the discussion that we need to have.
I would urge schools and teachers to not punish students for airing the concerns and make sure that the situation remained safe.
We want students to be thoughtful members of society. We want students to be problem solvers. We want students to be active in their communities.
I am not saying that they should protest everything as an excuse to get out of school. This situation is unique and deserves attention.
Educator John Dewey once stated, “Education is not preparation for life; education is life itself.” Let students experience life. There should be no punishment, no threats of retaliation. Teachers should not assign things during that time as punishment. Something need to change. In fact, I believe that teachers should join them to provide guidance, safety, and support.
Being a member of a democracy is work. Finding out what is important is work. Students should have the right to protest this event. We need safe schools and have serious discussions about them.
As an educator, I feel that it is my duty to address the tragedy in Parkland, Florida. And Marshall County, Kentucky. And Rancho Tehama Reserve, California. And Roseburg, Oregon. And Newtown, Connecticut. And…actually, the tragedy is that I was only picking places with many deaths. And public schools. If I were to list all school shootings, it would go on for pages and pages. And that is not counting non-school shootings. Las Vegas. Orlando. Virginia Tech (which is a school shooting, but not the P-12 system).
As a former teacher in Florida, I cannot fathom what the feelings are there.
To be clear, I am a proponent of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and what they stand for. However, this is a working document. It has been amended and changed. The First Amendment has limitations (such as you don’t have total free speech at work, speech at schools, obscenity, slander, etc.). After the Bill of Rights, there were 17 other amendments that were ratified. With changes in technology, the growth of the population, and other issues, we need to consider keeping the Constitution and Bill of Rights updated to match contemporary society. It has happened before (voting rights, term limits, etc.).
With that being said, our schools cannot be dangerous. Students need to feel safe to learn. Psychologist Abraham Maslow created a hierarchy of needs that need to be met for students to be able to become self-actualized and learn. Just about physiological needs are needs of safety. Without being safe, people cannot find love and belonging, self-esteem, and ultimately self-actualization.
A common idea that has been circulating is to arm teachers. As a former school teacher, in no way should an educator have that responsibility. Aside from the technical issues (where a gun would be, securing it, making sure it wasn’t stolen, etc.), an educator’s job is to educate. When the teacher becomes an armed bodyguard, it is time to rethink the entire system.
So, you might ask, what can we do? If we can’t protect ourselves, what options do we have? The problem is bigger than this. There are 5 million (that is 5,000,000) AR-15 rifles in circulation. That is one for every 65 people. There are also 270 guns in circulation in the U.S. How do these school shootings happen? People have guns.
I do not have a solution. But, I know we do need to start having serious conversations.
However, what I do know is that if we want students to be successful, to be critical and creative thinkers, they cannot live in fear. Right now, I think, there is fear. This happens too often. As a society, we get outraged, and then nothing changes. Well, something needs to change.
Our children are who we are. Each time one dies in a school shooting, or through suicide, or through careless behavior, we, as a country are diminished.
Friends, Colleagues, and Neighbors,
As we move forward in this election campaign, I have been blogging about education, our schools, my beliefs, and, to be honest, some random stuff. You can find my blog at http://andrewtkemp.com/blog/.
Today, I want to talk about the mission of the Columbia County School District. According to the website (http://www.ccboe.net/) the mission is We LEARN.
Lead by Example
Expect All to Succeed
Achieve excellence through engaging experiences
Respect and value each other
Now and tomorrow
Lead by Example: This first statement is essential. I think we should lead by example. However, what we want for our children is to be critical and creative thinkers. This is the example we must set. We must have teachers that are critical thinkers and creative practitioners to make education come alive. I know that many are, but we need to strive to make our schools not just places of content, but places if learning and inspiration.
Expect All to Succeed: This is a primary part of my platform—education for all. I want to ensure a quality education for all students regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, religion, sexuality, or ability. I want all students to succeed. However, we can’t have generic measures of success. Students are individuals. Our measures of success should allow for individuality.
Achieve Excellence Through Engaging Experiences: Learning is an active process. Learning needs context. Learning needs to be engaging. I think that students spend too much time in textbooks. I understand and support the need for a strong education filled with literature, science, social studies, math, music, career education, and art. However, much of what we do is about learning facts. We need to have students be engaged in their education through rethinking what we do.
Respect and Value Each Other: In these times of conflict and a society at social war within itself, I think that teaching about others is of vital importance. We are a society of different views, different beliefs, and different ways in which we define ourselves. We need to celebrate the diversity of everyone so that, perhaps, we can learn from each other and find commonality and unity in who we are.
Now and Tomorrow: I know it might seem odd, but I like this simple sentiment. Our schools need to focus on now and tomorrow. We don’t need to be stuck in the past with what we do. We must allow students not only live in the moment, to make decisions that can change their lives for the better, but to look toward making decisions for a better future.
My name is Andrew Kemp. I am running for the Columbia County School Board District 3.
Friends, Colleagues, and Neighbors,
While thinking about my candidacy for the School Board of Columbia County, Georgia, I have come to a conclusion. Education is an odd profession. I don’t mean the profession itself. I mean how we think of education. In almost every field, there is some board, governing body, or executive council that is tasked with overseeing the profession. For lawyers, it is the Bar Association. For doctors, it is the American Medical Association. Engineers? In Georgia we have the Georgia Board of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors. In each of these professions, experts in the field are tasked with making decisions. In fact, according to the state website regarding the Georgia Board of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, “The Board consists of nine members appointed by the Governor for a term of five years: six professional engineers, two land surveyors, and a member appointed from the public at large.”
So, why is it in education, the profession that has a direct influence on the future of society, do we give this task to lawyers, politicians, accountants, business people, and a host of other professions? Why isn’t the school board made up of educators?
Now, I do think that there should be representation of the community on a school board. However, like the Georgia Board of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, the bulk of the membership should be educators. In a 2009 study, the Council of Great City Schools found that only 14% of urban school board members were educators. This mirrors the 17% that I discovered doing research during my doctoral work.
So, why is it that we want professionals from the field to oversee other professions, but not in education? Being a teacher, educator, administrator, or other educational professional is not easy. It requires a degree. It requires certification. It requires certification examinations. Yes, representation of the community is important and essential to an effective school board. But, shouldn’t the bulk of decision makers be educators?
My name is Andrew Kemp. I am running for the Columbia County School Board in Georgia. I was a public school teacher for 9 years. I was a program coordinator for two years. I have a Master’s and Doctorate in education. I have taught in a College of Education for 10 years. I have the requisite knowledge and experience to help lead Columbia County Schools.
With the exception of a year, I have been a teacher or a student for my entire life. I have taught on many different levels. I have been a middle school teacher (okay, for one semester for student teaching...because of this, I have a profound respect for middle school teachers), high school, undergraduates and graduate students. I have coached soccer in youth leagues and high school. Education is in my blood.